Parsing Barbie
Diagramming Sarah
"There are plenty of people out there—not only English teachers but also amateur language buffs like me—who believe that diagramming a sentence provides insight into the mind of its perpetrator. The more the diagram is forced to wander around the page, loop back on itself, and generally stretch its capabilities, the more it reveals that the mind that created the sentence is either a richly educated one—with a Proustian grasp of language that pushes the limits of expression—or such an impoverished one that it can produce only hot air, baloney, and twaddle.
I found myself considering this paradox once again when confronted with the sentences of Sarah Palin, the Republican vice-presidential nominee. No one but a Republican denial specialist could argue with the fact that Sarah Palin's recent TV appearances have scaled the heights of inanity. The sentences she uttered in interviews with Charles Gibson, Sean Hannity, and Katie Couric seem to twitter all over the place like mourning doves frightened at the feeder. Which left me wondering: What can we learn from diagramming them?"
4 Comments:
We will never be sick of you! Best wishes!-Devin
The likely truth is not that she was heavily coached but was put under some type of hypnosis and fed the words and sentences she was to speak. Mind control.
That aside, the transparency of her was oh so obvious. She did not come across as someone who believed what she said.
She's the female GWB. With prettier hair. heh heh
Ha! I'd say she's the female Dan Quayle.
Diagramming sentences definitely can provide great insight into someone's real motives. The words they avoid, or obfuscate, the ones they trip on. Very informative.
Post a Comment
<< Home