Who's Doing The Bombing In Iraq?
Are the bombers Al-Qaeda, the CIA or Israel?
All the above, because they're all one and the same.
Fascists profit from chaos, in Iraq, the mayhem can be blamed for the hell on earth the occupiers have created. Bombings prove to racist, Foxified dullards that Ay-rabs aren't civilized. Sectarian strife keeps opposition to the invaders at a more moderate level. And the violence justifies continued occupation ad nauseum. A big thumbs up all around for the mass murderers.
"On 10 May there were more than two dozen bombings and shootings in Iraq that killed at least 85 people and injured at least 300.These were coordinated attacks, clearly by the same organization.The American response to this and other recent attacks is to delay plans for withdrawal of troops from Iraq. Obama’s election promise was to withdraw troops from Iraq by May this year. Not only is that obviously not going to happen but we learned after his election that “withdrawal” meant leaving 50,000 troops as ‘trainers’ as well as 4,500 special forces and tens of thousands of para-military contractors.Now, the US is reviewing even the slipped drawdown schedule out of concern for the security of the Iraqi people. Considering the million killed by the US and the four to five million refugees created by them I would not have thought that they would be bothered by fewer than one hundred dead in a little internal trouble. It might be said to be an improvement on US outcomes.As these attacks are providing the US with an excuse for delaying even its token withdrawal however, we need to think about who is behind them.
I wrote on 20 April that the probability is that the United States Central Intelligence Agency is behind these attacks, using local groups. It’s dirty tricks of this sort that the CIA does and is well financed by the US government to do. The US will never leave Iraq while there is oil in the ground, as I said in April 2008. I’m amazed that the media and even the US anti-war brigade still have faith that leaving will happen. The US didn’t go there in the first place, nor build its fortresses, in order to leave. As it happens, however, the elections to keep their puppet in place did not go to plan.
This latest series of attacks on top of a long series of lesser but still deadly attacks is not the work of a small group. It’s a large, well disciplined, well financed group with substantial support.The usual unnamed officials of unspecified nationality say that Al-Qaeda is doing the attacks. Well they would, wouldn’t they? Am I mistaken in recalling that General David Petraeus’s great success in Iraq was the elimination of Al-Qaeda? Or was that only while he was paying the Awakening Councils to go after them – if indeed Al-Qaeda was ever in Iraq at all. Since the Iraq invasion itself was based on a pack of lies there is no reason to believe anything that we are subsequently told about what is happening there or anywhere else where the US is involved."
All the above, because they're all one and the same.
Fascists profit from chaos, in Iraq, the mayhem can be blamed for the hell on earth the occupiers have created. Bombings prove to racist, Foxified dullards that Ay-rabs aren't civilized. Sectarian strife keeps opposition to the invaders at a more moderate level. And the violence justifies continued occupation ad nauseum. A big thumbs up all around for the mass murderers.
"On 10 May there were more than two dozen bombings and shootings in Iraq that killed at least 85 people and injured at least 300.These were coordinated attacks, clearly by the same organization.The American response to this and other recent attacks is to delay plans for withdrawal of troops from Iraq. Obama’s election promise was to withdraw troops from Iraq by May this year. Not only is that obviously not going to happen but we learned after his election that “withdrawal” meant leaving 50,000 troops as ‘trainers’ as well as 4,500 special forces and tens of thousands of para-military contractors.Now, the US is reviewing even the slipped drawdown schedule out of concern for the security of the Iraqi people. Considering the million killed by the US and the four to five million refugees created by them I would not have thought that they would be bothered by fewer than one hundred dead in a little internal trouble. It might be said to be an improvement on US outcomes.As these attacks are providing the US with an excuse for delaying even its token withdrawal however, we need to think about who is behind them.
I wrote on 20 April that the probability is that the United States Central Intelligence Agency is behind these attacks, using local groups. It’s dirty tricks of this sort that the CIA does and is well financed by the US government to do. The US will never leave Iraq while there is oil in the ground, as I said in April 2008. I’m amazed that the media and even the US anti-war brigade still have faith that leaving will happen. The US didn’t go there in the first place, nor build its fortresses, in order to leave. As it happens, however, the elections to keep their puppet in place did not go to plan.
This latest series of attacks on top of a long series of lesser but still deadly attacks is not the work of a small group. It’s a large, well disciplined, well financed group with substantial support.The usual unnamed officials of unspecified nationality say that Al-Qaeda is doing the attacks. Well they would, wouldn’t they? Am I mistaken in recalling that General David Petraeus’s great success in Iraq was the elimination of Al-Qaeda? Or was that only while he was paying the Awakening Councils to go after them – if indeed Al-Qaeda was ever in Iraq at all. Since the Iraq invasion itself was based on a pack of lies there is no reason to believe anything that we are subsequently told about what is happening there or anywhere else where the US is involved."
posted by nolocontendere at 9:36 PM
1 Comments:
There is only one entity that stands to profit from genocide in the Middle East, in terms of more land and resources for them...more "vacant" land which to move the unwanted palestinians to...after all, that was the reason that NYC lawyer and "refugee emigration" expert Arthur C. Helton was in Iraq shortly after the occupation began. He was in a hotel visiting the special envoy from the UN to discuss "the refugee question" when a huge carbomb driven by a suicide bomber, blew him and the UN envoy (Sergio de Mello) sky high.
After that, there was no more (open) talk about moving Palestinians to Iraq.
gc
Post a Comment
<< Home