Why Are People Believing NH Numbers?
When Diebold machines with the same old flaws were used to count around 80% of the precincts in the state? Do people think machines completely vulnerable to hacking in the past suddenly became trustworthy in 2008? Is there some sort of wishful thinking going on, or is it just that people are in denial about how rigged the farce really is?
LHS Associates had "...exclusive programming contracts for all New Hampshire voting machines"
They had "...inside access to every memory card in New Hampshire, as well as to the chips containing the "brain" of the Diebold optical scan machines.
LHS Associates programs all the memory cards in New Hampshire and Connecticut; about all of Vermont's voting machines, and has a lock on almost all of Massachusetts as well."
Security problems in New Hampshire haven't been fixed because "...the upgrade is not made unless the Ballot Law Commission meets," and "...the Ballot Law Commission has not bothered to meet since March 2006. Not only that, they have turned all the programming over to a sole source private company, taking vote counting for 81 percent of New Hampshire citizens out of the public domain."
Isn't it strange that Obama led in counties where the numbers were hand counted yet lost to Clinton overall?
Isn't it strange that in Sutton County, with 100% of the votes accounted for, Ron Paul got zero votes but there were Paul supporters there who voted for him:
"This town numbers are wrong wrong wrong on this map. I am from Sutton originally and my parents and one aunt all voted for Ron Paul today and Sutton says 0. So this is wrong."
Isn't it strange how Obama and Paul poll workers were kicked out of some precincts?
The War Party is out to steal yet another "election" and the fix is in early in the primaries. The overlords have to make sure that only the approved candidates get the nod and since the machines that are entrusted to tabulate the votes are well known to be easily corrupted, the task is child's play. And they'll get away with it yet again because of people's naivete and trust in a filthy, manipulated ripoff.
added - As of late Wed night, 1/9, not one peep of any of this at ABC/CBS/MSNBC/CNN/FOX. The bullshit explanation that Clinton's misty eyed performance for the camera brought out the womans' vote seems to be the propaganda explanation of choice for the first place showing.
A brief look at NH papers finds but one article in the Concord Monitor about pollsters scratching their heads about how they could be so wrong. Memo to the Monitor - they weren't.
LHS Associates had "...exclusive programming contracts for all New Hampshire voting machines"
They had "...inside access to every memory card in New Hampshire, as well as to the chips containing the "brain" of the Diebold optical scan machines.
LHS Associates programs all the memory cards in New Hampshire and Connecticut; about all of Vermont's voting machines, and has a lock on almost all of Massachusetts as well."
Security problems in New Hampshire haven't been fixed because "...the upgrade is not made unless the Ballot Law Commission meets," and "...the Ballot Law Commission has not bothered to meet since March 2006. Not only that, they have turned all the programming over to a sole source private company, taking vote counting for 81 percent of New Hampshire citizens out of the public domain."
Isn't it strange that Obama led in counties where the numbers were hand counted yet lost to Clinton overall?
Isn't it strange that in Sutton County, with 100% of the votes accounted for, Ron Paul got zero votes but there were Paul supporters there who voted for him:
"This town numbers are wrong wrong wrong on this map. I am from Sutton originally and my parents and one aunt all voted for Ron Paul today and Sutton says 0. So this is wrong."
Isn't it strange how Obama and Paul poll workers were kicked out of some precincts?
The War Party is out to steal yet another "election" and the fix is in early in the primaries. The overlords have to make sure that only the approved candidates get the nod and since the machines that are entrusted to tabulate the votes are well known to be easily corrupted, the task is child's play. And they'll get away with it yet again because of people's naivete and trust in a filthy, manipulated ripoff.
added - As of late Wed night, 1/9, not one peep of any of this at ABC/CBS/MSNBC/CNN/FOX. The bullshit explanation that Clinton's misty eyed performance for the camera brought out the womans' vote seems to be the propaganda explanation of choice for the first place showing.
A brief look at NH papers finds but one article in the Concord Monitor about pollsters scratching their heads about how they could be so wrong. Memo to the Monitor - they weren't.
posted by nolocontendere at 6:17 AM
7 Comments:
... and it begins.
These damn machines are a bane to the shred of democracy we have left. "Surprising" numbers will plague this race from now on, putting Hillary 'big money' Clinton ahead in every case.
And, in the end, put a war monger in the white house.
GAH!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but, hasn't the whole Diebold voting-machine issue been down-played and ignored by the MSM?
Hasn't the voting-machine fraud issue been limited to the internet, and even there, mainly to alternative news websites?
The point being, the majority of Americans may still be clueless about it.
1984 and Big Brother are a Reality!
thanks for posting this. i was too tired to look online for the proof about my suspicions. immediately upon seeing hillary had taken nh, i knew we had just seen (yet another) rigged election. i may swipe some of these links and post them on my blog.
That is some REAL tin-foil hat shit there. Sadly, I totally agree. Welcome to the USSR.....fucked We the people are.
The numbers are completely, totally made up from those machines. Hand counts are the only way to go but Rovian propagandists made sure we all laughed at the hanging chad imbroglio back in 2000 and demanded a more "precise" machine count in our elections.
The vile MSM is silent.
Ben on January 9th, 2008
Just for all the doubters…..
If they try to rig the election against Ron Paul, and these stories are picked up more and more, some of it will be leaked out to the ‘non-ron’ people. More and more people, having heard from their friends, relatives, fellow employees, managers, teachers, street preachers that the election is being rigged against Paul, and then coming across EVIDENCE of it, one person at a time will join the movement for truth and question the motives of those who seek to bury Paul. Don’t you see? The ONLY reason they would need to resort to ‘limiting’ Ron Paul to “only” 10% or 8% of the vote, the ONLY REASON that they would risk giving us more ammunition in the infowar, is if Ron Paul is a CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER to them! Why risk exposing themselves as criminal fascists (via an obvious fixed election) if they can achieve their goals simply by not giving him airtime? No, no, no. What we are seeing is the beginning of a peak result from all the man(and woman)-hours put in by the Truth movement and the Ron Paul Movement to bring the media to account. They know that they have to take a giant leap in their methods to combat us in any effective way. And that means taking a larger chunk of risk. Many fear the message of Ron Paul is not being heard. But if that were the case, and the exponential growth is at an end, then why the sudden NH Primary “Pauls-a-racist” smear campaign? I dont know if Ron Paul will win the Presidency. But we need to look at the facts, and the facts would seem to indicate that Paul’s movement is still gaining ground. They would seem to indicate that the establishment is increasingly concerned for the continuance of its current shape under the conditions that Alex Jones, Ron Paul, The Patriot Movement, We Are Change, Scholars for 911 Truth, Aaron Russo, and thousands upon thousands of freedom-loving individuals have painstakingly created in the last three years, mainly (after the tireless campaigning of some for the last twelve or so). Why be negative about it now, at one of the most important moments to not falter, not worry, not slacken our grip on our potential freedom, but to charge headlong at the enemy for yet another artillery barrage in the infowar! DON’T GIVE UP THIS IS WORKING! I WILL NEVER EVER BE ABLE TO LOOK MY 11YR OLD DAUGHTER AND MY 6 MONTH OLD SON IN THE EYES IN FUTURE AND FEEL I HAVE DONE MY BEST UNLESS I MAKE THE OBVIOUS CHOICE OF FIGHTING FOR THEIR FREEDOM! WE CAN WIN THIS! RALLY FOR PAUL! RALLY FOR FREEDOM! RALLY FOR TRUTH! WE ARE NOT WEAK, THIS IS THE STRONGEST MASS MOVEMENT SINCE THE 60′S AND THIS TIME THE MOVEMENT CROSSES THE BOUNDARIES OF SPECIAL INTEREST We are not weak, this is the strongest mass movement since the march for civil rights, but also, this time the movement crosses the boundaries of class, race, culture, religion, and political ’side-of-the-fence’. This is historic! We are members of a movement that will be noted in history as either violent agitators, or the force to restore America’s essence. The latter is almost certain if we wake up to the extent of the movements strength.
PEACE, LOVE AND HARMONY WILL BE OURS…
ericswan, I think you're right on the money about the execrable MSM and the cabal's reaction to the Paul movement. They've gone beyond the ignoring stage and are starting to attack him, like with that National Review racist hit piece. It's actually a sign that they're getting very nervous and frightened. It also should show people how controlled and sickeningly corrupt the entire process is.
Post a Comment
<< Home