New Hampshire District Admits To Vote Fraud
Ooopsie, our bad
They got caught red handed and sometime today changed the count. The fixers for the War Party kept Ron Paul from finishing at least in 3rd place and kept Obama from winning in New Hampshire. And this was only one hand count - the machine count was 80% of the total, not in the public domain and cannot be verified.
The entire process was a fraud.
"The head clerk of the New Hampshire town of Sutton has been forced to admit that Ron Paul received 31 votes yet when the final amount was transferred to a summary sheet and sent out to the media, the total was listed as zero. The fiasco throws the entire primary into doubt and could lead to a re-count.
As we reported earlier today, an entire family voted for Ron Paul in Sutton, yet when the voting map on the Politico website was posted, the total votes for Ron Paul were zero.
Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming "human error" was responsible for the mistake.
Two or three votes not counted could be a plausible mistake - but 31 votes for one candidate?
The classic method for rigging a hand count is to write the wrong number on the form," Harris told the Alex Jones Show.
"They are counting everything in public real nice, they fill out a form in public real nice and then they transfer it to another form and they call that a summary sheet and then that is the one they send in," explained Harris."
Also - someone sending out a message?
They got caught red handed and sometime today changed the count. The fixers for the War Party kept Ron Paul from finishing at least in 3rd place and kept Obama from winning in New Hampshire. And this was only one hand count - the machine count was 80% of the total, not in the public domain and cannot be verified.
The entire process was a fraud.
"The head clerk of the New Hampshire town of Sutton has been forced to admit that Ron Paul received 31 votes yet when the final amount was transferred to a summary sheet and sent out to the media, the total was listed as zero. The fiasco throws the entire primary into doubt and could lead to a re-count.
As we reported earlier today, an entire family voted for Ron Paul in Sutton, yet when the voting map on the Politico website was posted, the total votes for Ron Paul were zero.
Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming "human error" was responsible for the mistake.
Two or three votes not counted could be a plausible mistake - but 31 votes for one candidate?
The classic method for rigging a hand count is to write the wrong number on the form," Harris told the Alex Jones Show.
"They are counting everything in public real nice, they fill out a form in public real nice and then they transfer it to another form and they call that a summary sheet and then that is the one they send in," explained Harris."
Also - someone sending out a message?
Giuliani Gets 9.11% In Three Towns
|
posted by nolocontendere at 8:05 PM
3 Comments:
Wow, that's an incredible catch on the 9.11 thing --
what a total trip.
I fear I'm becoming a piglipstick fanboi, I'm reprinting this 9.11% thing, it's just too good.
Always glad to see you, snag anything you like.
Post a Comment
<< Home