Looks Like The Rudester Is Gone
And good riddance.
And I was wrong about him being installed. The way I look at this presidential personality parade is that voters decide very little besides local politics. Our overlords don't take any chances with democracy and have totally corrupted the election processes. Elections in the US have always been tampered with but since 2000 have been completely rigged to the point of comical carelessness.
A year ago Giuliani was touted as the repug front runner for no reason other than name recognition and tireless self promotion. That he was getting so much play and such a free ride in the impure MSM with their front runner designation told me volumes about who we were supposed to pay attention to. 9/11 was the bedrock where the fascists built their house of horror - everything started with their "terrorist" lollapalooza. As mayor of NY at the time Giuliani made sure to take good care of the crime scene and was allowed to profit enormously from his obedience to the ziofascist agenda of endless war abroad and police state at home. Another local guy who acted as loyal enabler to the agenda was Bill Clinton who made sure his end of the cocaine/Contra pipeline in the mid 80s went smoothly. He was groomed and polished up and emerged from obscurity to be handed the presidency for his loyalty. A year ago the process looked like it was going to be repeated.
After all the Rudester was more than acceptable to Israel firsters, an essential requirement to hold high office in america. He was deemed the most Israel-friendly candidate right from the start. Also his, um, draconian views on freedom and authoritarian excess would have been a fine segue from the current constitution shred-happy cabal. He was a steady cheerleader for the carnage overseas, perfect for continuing the filthy but oh so lucrative WOT facade. The polling data we were supposed to believe had G ahead with double digits most of last year.
But something changed behind the scenes, something pretty drastic that made the decision makers pull the plug on a Giuliani presidency. We can only speculate what that was. His campaigning was endlessly irritating. Some point to his shamelessly criminal cohorts, although that smear can be used on any number of would be gladhanders. Tabloid ready personal turmoil? Not likely. We have to keep in mind the fact that what the public perceives is totally manipulated so any foibles or merits can be either magnified or eliminated in the media. Viable candidates with popular platforms can be erased at will - just look at what was done to Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich. The most important factor for an aspiring applicant is how well he/she will serve the fascist agenda.
The one other scenario that appealed to me last year as being a possibility is the favorite authoritarian ploy of police stations everywhere - the good cop/bad cop act. First the biggest, meanest looking cop comes in to scare the shit out of you, threatening to tear your head off and piss in the tubes, then a kinder, more gentle cop comes on the scene to gain your trust and in your desperation you glom onto him (or her). The Bushista maladministration is now so universally loathed that the manipulators may install what the country perceives as the good cop, a welcome relief. Touting change this good cop will throw some crumbs but will in essence continue the same fascist bullshit, not rocking the boat in the slightest.
So Hizzoner's lights are out and he'll endorse McCain but it won't mean a thing, really. The filthy scam will go on and the media will be all atwitter about the little nothings in a thoroughly corrupt circus. At least this repulsive 9/11 bagman is out of our faces.
And I was wrong about him being installed. The way I look at this presidential personality parade is that voters decide very little besides local politics. Our overlords don't take any chances with democracy and have totally corrupted the election processes. Elections in the US have always been tampered with but since 2000 have been completely rigged to the point of comical carelessness.
A year ago Giuliani was touted as the repug front runner for no reason other than name recognition and tireless self promotion. That he was getting so much play and such a free ride in the impure MSM with their front runner designation told me volumes about who we were supposed to pay attention to. 9/11 was the bedrock where the fascists built their house of horror - everything started with their "terrorist" lollapalooza. As mayor of NY at the time Giuliani made sure to take good care of the crime scene and was allowed to profit enormously from his obedience to the ziofascist agenda of endless war abroad and police state at home. Another local guy who acted as loyal enabler to the agenda was Bill Clinton who made sure his end of the cocaine/Contra pipeline in the mid 80s went smoothly. He was groomed and polished up and emerged from obscurity to be handed the presidency for his loyalty. A year ago the process looked like it was going to be repeated.
After all the Rudester was more than acceptable to Israel firsters, an essential requirement to hold high office in america. He was deemed the most Israel-friendly candidate right from the start. Also his, um, draconian views on freedom and authoritarian excess would have been a fine segue from the current constitution shred-happy cabal. He was a steady cheerleader for the carnage overseas, perfect for continuing the filthy but oh so lucrative WOT facade. The polling data we were supposed to believe had G ahead with double digits most of last year.
But something changed behind the scenes, something pretty drastic that made the decision makers pull the plug on a Giuliani presidency. We can only speculate what that was. His campaigning was endlessly irritating. Some point to his shamelessly criminal cohorts, although that smear can be used on any number of would be gladhanders. Tabloid ready personal turmoil? Not likely. We have to keep in mind the fact that what the public perceives is totally manipulated so any foibles or merits can be either magnified or eliminated in the media. Viable candidates with popular platforms can be erased at will - just look at what was done to Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich. The most important factor for an aspiring applicant is how well he/she will serve the fascist agenda.
The one other scenario that appealed to me last year as being a possibility is the favorite authoritarian ploy of police stations everywhere - the good cop/bad cop act. First the biggest, meanest looking cop comes in to scare the shit out of you, threatening to tear your head off and piss in the tubes, then a kinder, more gentle cop comes on the scene to gain your trust and in your desperation you glom onto him (or her). The Bushista maladministration is now so universally loathed that the manipulators may install what the country perceives as the good cop, a welcome relief. Touting change this good cop will throw some crumbs but will in essence continue the same fascist bullshit, not rocking the boat in the slightest.
So Hizzoner's lights are out and he'll endorse McCain but it won't mean a thing, really. The filthy scam will go on and the media will be all atwitter about the little nothings in a thoroughly corrupt circus. At least this repulsive 9/11 bagman is out of our faces.
posted by nolocontendere at 4:29 AM
4 Comments:
I've felt since the onset that Hillary would take the nomination. If anything, to continue the Bush/Clinton legacy.
You could be right, noiin, there were a lot of people who noticed the closeness of the two clans and thought juggling between the two was good enough to make people believe there was some sort of democratic process. From what I understand she's pretty high up in the cult order of things, higher than Bill.
I've seen through her con job from the beginning of her campaign. She is one of THEM.
The faux hatred of Hillary literally makes me laugh out loud.
Poor, misguided sheeple.
She's sure a piece of work, ul, demagoguery at it's finest.
Post a Comment
<< Home