Monday, April 23, 2012

Your National Parks To Be Fascist Security Zones

Vat are you doink mit that camera? Halt! Shnell!

Republicans Push For Department of Homeland Security Takeover of National Parks

"Republicans in the House are pushing to give control of at least 50 national parks within 100 miles of the US border to the Department of Homeland Security.

The National Security and Federal Lands Protection Act would allow DHS to suspend any federal law on lands run by the departments of Agriculture and Interior.

A recent article published in the LA Times documents the way most Rhino conservatives will be thinking heading into the November elections.

House Republicans are backing legislation in Congress to give the Department of Homeland Security control of more than 50 national parks and forests within 100 miles of the U.S. borders, including in Washington state.

The legislation involves a sweep of land along the frontier with Canada and Mexico, but exempts state land, private property and federal holdings used for mining, livestock grazing and timber harvesting. The new authority would carve through 54 national parks.

Among the parks that would be affected are North Cascades National Park and Olympic National Park in Washington; Glacier National Park in Montana; Saguaro National Park in Arizona; and Acadia National Park in Maine. National forests along the border, and areas protected as wilderness, also could be affected.

Perhaps the most startling aspect of this plan by House Republicans is the fact that it would let DHS conduct any activity or construct any facility that they claim is required to secure the border.

The National Security and Federal Lands Protection Act, sponsored by conservative Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, would give Border Patrol and Customs agents and other federal officials the right to suspend any federal law, including environmental laws, on land managed by the departments of Interior and Agriculture.

It would give Homeland Security the right to conduct any activity or construct any facility required to secure the border.

Sadly, the fact remains that DHS is NOT about securing our border and giving them new powers to construct facilities in the name of border security may be a cover for a more sinister plan involving a martial law takeover and DHS/FEMA camps.

For their part, the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees has issued a stark warning that calls this DHS takeover plan unprecedented with the potential to devastate 54 of America’s national parks, forests, and historical sites as well as negatively effect the economy."

Not completely unexpected, really. Aside from being free to have our own bodies, meaning having the freedom to do whatever we want, ingesting whatever we want, fucking whoever we want, terminating our existence when we feel the need to whenever we want, public places was the single most threatening concept in this new era of total dominance by fascist fuckwads. Commonwealth is systematically destroyed as we frogs are slowly boiled.
There was always a sinister aspect to the southern border problems. Aside from a shitload of money in the correct pockets, what's the drug war been all about?
Well, my guess is the ability to implement fascism with all the necessary justifications to make it palatable for the FAUXified rubes.
The Obama Mob was caught with Operation Fast And Furious.
Lets' grab the guns!
The problem is that the money junkies need lettuce pickers while the government has to maintain the posture that illegal border crossing is a no no.
They want the best of all worlds.
And they need threats to enhance their stranglehold on our throats. So of course our communal National Parks and Monuments will be eliminated because some made up or manufactured garbage is balleyhooed as "national security issues" They don't want us to collectively own anything anymore, they want to collectively own and control us.


Post a Comment

<< Home

Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
To see more details, click here.