Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Vaccination Laws State By State

Where you can check the wording to see if the governor can order mandatory innoculations. Sadly, the state I'm now in allows the government to force people to take shots and relocate citizens at will.

"C. In addition to the authority provided in subsections A and B, during a state of emergency or state of war emergency in which there is an occurrence or the imminent threat of smallpox, plague, viral hemorrhagic fevers or a highly contagious and highly fatal disease with transmission characteristics similar to smallpox, the governor, in consultation with the director of the department of health services, may issue orders that:
1. Mandate treatment or vaccination of persons who are diagnosed with illness resulting from exposure or who are reasonably believed to have been exposed or who may reasonably be expected to be exposed.
2. Isolate and quarantine persons.

Link here

Something to remember if any government decides to mandate forced vaccinations or "resettlement"

"This July 4th, like every year, millions of Americans are
celebrating Independence Day with various parades, picnics,
fireworks, and so on. But how many of those people celebrating have
ever actually considered what the Declaration was actually about,
and what the colonists actually did? The colonists did not merely
beg the king to change his ways. In fact, the Declaration explains
how they had tried that, to no avail. Instead, the colonists were
doing something far more drastic.

In short, they committed treason. They broke the law. They disobeyed their government. They were traitors, criminals and tax cheats. The Boston Tea Party was not merely a tax protest, but open lawlessness. Furthermore, truth be told, some of the colonists were even cop-killers. At Lexington, when King George's "law enforcers"told the colonists to lay down their guns, the colonists responded with, "No, you're not the boss of us!" (Well, that was the meaning,if not the exact verbiage.) And so we had "The Shot Heard 'Round the World," widely regarded as the beginning of the AmericanRevolution.

Looking back now, we know the outcome. We know who eventually won, and we don't mind cheering for the rebels. But make no mistake:when you cheer for the founders of this country, you are cheeringfor law-breakers and traitors. As well you should. But, for all the flag-waving and celebrating that goes on every July 4th, do Americans actually believe in what the colonists did? Do they really believe in the attitude expressed in the Declaration of Independence? Are they really still capable of supporting a mantra of "You're not the boss of me!"?

In, short, no. Imagine the equivalent of what the colonists did somany years ago, being done today. Imagine a group of people writinga letter to the United States government, sending a letter to Congress and to the President, saying that they would no longer pay federal taxes, they would no longer obey federal laws, and that they would resist--by force, if necessary--any attempt by federal agents to enforce those laws. How would a group which did such things be viewed today, by most Americans?

They would be viewed as nut-cases, scofflaws and terrorists,despicable criminals and malcontents. They would be scorned as the scum of the earth, despised by just about everyone who today celebrates Independence Day.

How ironic.

So why the double standard? Why would the American public today condemn the exact same attitudes and behaviors which they glorify and praise in the context of the American Revolution? Quite simply, it's because, for all the proud talk of "land of the free and home of the brave," the spirit of resistance--the courage to say "You're not the boss of us!"--has been trained out of the American people.

We have become a nation of wimps."

"Make no mistake, begging and whining is not what the Declaration of Independence was about. It was about breaking the law, when the law is unjust. It was about committing treason, when the rulers became oppressive. It was about disobedience--civil disobedience, when effective, and not-so-civil disobedience when necessary. It was about open resistance, including violent resistance when called for."

1 Comments:

Anonymous nick z said...

The MSM propagandists and politicians, who work together for the corproate ruling-class, promote the idea that anyone that opposes or resists the US government, such as it is, is working against those mighty democratic ideals which were established by the founders. Too many people just don't see the massive hypocrisy in the system and too many succumb to the nationalistic propaganda perpetuated by the MSM and the government.

We're programmed to think that anyone that supports or suggests revolutionary changes to the present corporate ruling-class is an enemy of the state, and the MSM brands them either anarchists, socialists, or psychotics. It's nearly impossible to make peaceful political changes when a party of individuals is branded "evil" from the very start.

12/8/09 10:42 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
To see more details, click here.