Monday, August 04, 2008

Police Steal Guns Via "Minority Report" Law

Aside from being unconstitutional this is asinine and won't work, and I'm surprised that it hasn't been stricken from the books. It's probable that the citizens who get the special treatment are indigent and can't fight back. Plus, the whole procedure seems to be run very loosely.
Say someone has a grudge against a neighbor for some reason. All they have to do is call the cops and tell them they're afraid of getting shot.

Police Seizing Guns Before Crime Is Committed

"HARTFORD -- Using a unique state law, police in Connecticut have disarmed dozens of gun owners based on suspicions that they might harm themselves or others.The state's gun seizure law is considered the first and only law in the country that allows the confiscation of a gun before the owner commits an act of violence. Police and state prosecutors can obtain seizure warrants based on concerns about someone's intentions.State police and 53 police departments have seized more than 1,700 guns since the law took effect in October 1999, according to a new report to the legislature. There are nearly 900,000 privately owned firearms in Connecticut today.
(...)
Robert T. Crook, the executive director of the Connecticut Coalition of Sportsmen, questioned whether police have seized more guns than the number reported to the legislature. Crook said the law doesn't require police departments or the courts to compile or report information on gun seizures. The Office of Legislative Research acknowledged that its report may have underreported seizures."We don't know how many guns were actually confiscated or returned to their owners," Crook said."

Here's a prime example of abuse, without the victim breaking any laws.

"A Torrington man was one of the 22 gun owners who are known to have had their seized firearms returned to them.In October 2006, Torrington police got a seizure warrant after the man made 28 unsubstantiated claims of vandalism to his property in three-year period. In the application, police described the man's behavior as paranoid and delusional. They said he installed an alarm system, surveillance cameras, noise emitting devices and spotlights for self-protection. They also reported that he had a pistol permit and possessed firearms.
A judge ordered the man's guns returned four months after police seized them. The judge said the police had failed to show the man posed any risk to himself or others. There also was no documented history of mental illness, no criminal record and no history of misusing firearms. "In fact, the firearms were found in a locked safe when the officers executed the warrant," the ruling said."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
To see more details, click here.